Flashcards for topic Rotational Mechanics
When a rigid body is in rotational equilibrium but the resultant external force on it is zero, what appears to be a paradox occurs. Explain this situation and its resolution.
Apparent Paradox:
Resolution:
Example: A pulley with a bucket going down a well
For complete equilibrium, both conditions must be satisfied independently:
Explain the three types of equilibrium (stable, unstable, and neutral) for a rigid body. How can you determine which type exists in a given configuration?
Three Types of Equilibrium:
Stable Equilibrium:
Unstable Equilibrium:
Neutral Equilibrium:
Determining type: Examine what happens to the center of mass height during a small displacement. The direction of potential energy change (increase, decrease, or constant) indicates the type of equilibrium.
How does the constraint of a fixed rotation axis affect the degrees of freedom of a rigid body, and what fundamental principle governs this type of motion?
Constraints on degrees of freedom:
Governing principle:
Example: When you hold a tennis racket at both ends and rotate it, despite its complex shape, its motion is completely described by a single angle of rotation about the axis between your hands.
When calculating torque about an axis, what are the special cases where a force produces zero torque?
A force produces zero torque about an axis in two specific cases:
When the force is parallel to the axis of rotation
When the force intersects the axis of rotation
Any force that neither intersects nor is parallel to the axis will produce a non-zero torque about that axis.
Given a force acting on a rigid body at point P, and an axis of rotation AB that is skew (non-intersecting) to the force, how do you determine the torque about this axis?
To determine the torque about axis AB:
Alternatively:
The direction of the torque is along the axis, determined by the right-hand rule.
When deriving Γ = Iα for a rotating rigid body, what is the physical significance of separating forces into components, and why does the radial component contribute nothing to the angular acceleration?
Physical significance of force components in deriving Γ = Iα:
This separation reveals the fundamental principle that only forces with components perpendicular to the radius can change a body's rotation rate, while radial forces merely maintain the circular path. This parallels how only forces parallel to velocity can change speed in linear motion.
When a rigid body rotates about an axis AB, how do you calculate its total angular momentum from the contributions of its individual particles?
The total angular momentum of a rigid body rotating about axis AB is the sum of the angular momenta of all its constituent particles:
L = ∑mᵢvᵢrᵢ = ∑mᵢ(rᵢω)rᵢ = ω∑mᵢrᵢ² = Iω
Where:
This summation approach works because each particle in the rigid body moves in a circular path perpendicular to the axis of rotation, with its own contribution to the total angular momentum.
How can you derive the formula tan(θ) = v²/rg for a leaning cyclist, and what assumptions does this derivation make?
Derivation of tan(θ) = v²/rg for a leaning cyclist:
Choose a rotating reference frame with origin at the turn's center
In this frame, the cyclist is stationary but experiences a centrifugal force Mv²/r
For translational equilibrium:
Taking the ratio:
Assumptions:
The formula shows that faster speeds or smaller turn radii require greater lean angles. This explains why motorcyclists lean more dramatically when taking sharp turns at high speeds.
When two objects with moments of inertia and are coupled on the same axis, one initially rotating at angular velocity and the other at rest, what is their final common angular velocity?
Using conservation of angular momentum:
Initial angular momentum = Final angular momentum
Solving for :
Example: For two identical wheels () where one rotates at and the other is at rest, when coupled:
The final angular velocity always decreases due to conservation of angular momentum distributed over greater rotational inertia.
How does the Pythagorean relationship apply when finding the perpendicular distance from a particle P(xᵢ, yᵢ, zᵢ) to the X-axis, and how would this formula change for other coordinate axes?
For a particle P(xᵢ, yᵢ, zᵢ):
Perpendicular distance to X-axis:
Perpendicular distance to Y-axis:
Perpendicular distance to Z-axis:
This relationship is fundamental for calculating moment of inertia I = ∑mᵢrᵢ², which determines an object's resistance to rotational acceleration.
Showing 10 of 99 cards. Add this deck to your collection to see all cards.