Flashcards for topic Permanent Magnets
How does a compass needle behave when subjected to two perpendicular magnetic fields, and what determines its final position?
When a compass needle is subjected to two perpendicular magnetic fields:
The final position is determined by:
This principle is utilized in tangent galvanometers and other magnetic measuring instruments.
In a scenario where a magnetic needle deflects from its north-south alignment, calculate the strength of an unknown perpendicular magnetic field given:
Using the tangent law of perpendicular magnetic fields:
Step 1: Identify the formula relating the fields and deflection angle:
Step 2: Substitute the known values:
Step 3: Calculate the unknown field:
The perpendicular magnetic field strength is 1.73 × 10^-5 T.
Note: This principle is fundamental to field measurement techniques and explains why a compass needle deviates in the presence of external magnetic sources.
Why does a moving-coil galvanometer include a soft-iron core, and how does this design choice affect its sensitivity?
A soft-iron core is included in a moving-coil galvanometer to:
This design significantly enhances sensitivity because:
The soft-iron core thus transforms what would be a moderately sensitive instrument into a high-precision measuring device suitable for detecting microampere-level currents.
What is the Tan-A position in a deflection magnetometer, and how is the bar magnet oriented relative to the compass needle?
The Tan-A position in a deflection magnetometer is characterized by: • The arms of the magnetometer are aligned along the magnetic east-west direction • The bar magnet is placed parallel to the arm's length (east-west orientation) • The compass needle is in "end-on" position relative to the bar magnet • The distance 'd' is measured from the center of the compass to the center of the magnet • This arrangement allows measurement of M/BH (ratio of magnetic moment to horizontal component of Earth's field) • The magnetic field due to the bar magnet is perpendicular to Earth's horizontal field in this position
Formula used: , where θ is the deflection angle
What experimental techniques eliminate reading errors in compass-based measurements of magnetic deflection angles?
Techniques to eliminate reading errors in magnetic deflection angle measurements:
Symmetrical reading technique:
Mirror alignment method:
Rotation compensation:
Multiple measurement protocol:
Example application: When determining M/BH ratio (magnetic moment/horizontal field) using Tan-A position of Gauss, these techniques can improve measurement precision from ±5% to better than ±1%.
How does the relationship between cotθ (the cotangent of deflection angle) and (d²-l²)²/2d verify the inverse square law for magnetic fields in Tan-A position experiments?
The linear relationship between cotθ and (d²-l²)²/2d directly verifies the inverse square law because:
This relationship is derived from the basic principle that magnetic field due to a magnetic pole is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the pole.
What is the mathematical difference between Tan-A and Tan-B position experiments when verifying the inverse square law for magnetic fields, and why do both approaches yield valid results?
Tan-A and Tan-B positions differ in their mathematical relationships:
Tan-A position (end-on):
Tan-B position (broadside-on):
Both yield valid results because:
This demonstrates the robustness of the inverse square law regardless of measurement configuration.
What is the mathematical expression for the restoring torque on a magnetic needle oscillating in a uniform magnetic field, and how does this relate to simple harmonic motion?
The restoring torque on an oscillating magnetic needle in a uniform magnetic field is:
Where:
For small oscillations, , so:
This creates simple harmonic motion because:
This gives a time period:
Application: This principle is used in oscillation magnetometers to determine .
How does the behavior of field lines differ between an electric dipole and a magnetic dipole when intersecting a closed surface that encloses only one pole?
When a closed surface encloses only one pole of a dipole:
For magnetic dipoles:
For electric dipoles:
This fundamental difference demonstrates why isolated electric charges can exist while magnetic monopoles cannot.
Compare and contrast Tan-A vs Tan-B positions in a deflection magnetometer, explaining how each configuration allows the calculation of and the physical principles behind them.
Both configurations rely on the tangent law of perpendicular fields:
Note: Both methods measure the same physical quantity but through different geometric arrangements, providing verification through multiple approaches.
Showing 10 of 85 cards. Add this deck to your collection to see all cards.